<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1024 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763444</link>
    <description>Service tax demand for the period 01.07.2004 to 31.03.2006 was found time-barred because the show cause notice was issued later by invoking the extended limitation period without establishing the requisite elements for that exception. The record did not show intentional suppression or wilful evasion by the distributor/commission agent, and the Tribunal followed its consistent view in similar Amway distributor matters that the extended period was not applicable. The demand was therefore set aside on limitation alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1024 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763444</link>
      <description>Service tax demand for the period 01.07.2004 to 31.03.2006 was found time-barred because the show cause notice was issued later by invoking the extended limitation period without establishing the requisite elements for that exception. The record did not show intentional suppression or wilful evasion by the distributor/commission agent, and the Tribunal followed its consistent view in similar Amway distributor matters that the extended period was not applicable. The demand was therefore set aside on limitation alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>