https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763455 CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal where the appellant sought benefit of Nil CVD under Notification 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 as amended. The benefit was denied as the notification was amended by Notifications 34/2015-CE and 37/2015-CE. Following precedent in HLG Trading case, the tribunal held that appellant was not eligible for the benefit and lower authorities correctly rejected the claim. The impugned order was upheld with no interference warranted. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763455 CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal where the appellant sought benefit of Nil CVD under Notification 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 as amended. The benefit was denied as the notification was amended by Notifications 34/2015-CE and 37/2015-CE. Following precedent in HLG Trading case, the tribunal held that appellant was not eligible for the benefit and lower authorities correctly rejected the claim. The impugned order was upheld with no interference warranted. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763455