<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant was entitled to the Basic Customs Duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005, as amended. It found that the Revenue&#039;s denial of the exemption was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s Order-in-Appeal and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting any consequential benefits according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1036 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant was entitled to the Basic Customs Duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005, as amended. It found that the Revenue&#039;s denial of the exemption was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s Order-in-Appeal and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, granting any consequential benefits according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>