<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1064 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763484</link>
    <description>Delhi HC ruled in favor of assessee bank on multiple issues. Court held Section 14A disallowance inapplicable to banks following Supreme Court precedent in Maxopp Investments Ltd. Amortization of premium on held-to-maturity securities was allowed as proper accounting practice. Loss from transferring securities between portfolios was permitted, following Oriental Bank of Commerce precedent. Deduction for employee pension fund contributions was upheld as business expenditure. Goodwill treatment from bank amalgamation was sustained based on consistent past treatment and established precedents. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed with no substantial questions of law arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1064 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763484</link>
      <description>Delhi HC ruled in favor of assessee bank on multiple issues. Court held Section 14A disallowance inapplicable to banks following Supreme Court precedent in Maxopp Investments Ltd. Amortization of premium on held-to-maturity securities was allowed as proper accounting practice. Loss from transferring securities between portfolios was permitted, following Oriental Bank of Commerce precedent. Deduction for employee pension fund contributions was upheld as business expenditure. Goodwill treatment from bank amalgamation was sustained based on consistent past treatment and established precedents. Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed with no substantial questions of law arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>