https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763495 The HC directed the respondents to conclude the final order within one month regarding the blocking of the petitioner's account and Input Tax Credit under Section 74 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was allowed to operate its account upon furnishing a surety of Rs. 32,70,384. The court vacated the interim order and disposed of the Writ Petition, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution while protecting revenue under Section 86-A. The court balanced timely adjudication with fair treatment for the petitioner, ensuring compliance with the CGST Act provisions. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763495 The HC directed the respondents to conclude the final order within one month regarding the blocking of the petitioner's account and Input Tax Credit under Section 74 of the CGST Act. The petitioner was allowed to operate its account upon furnishing a surety of Rs. 32,70,384. The court vacated the interim order and disposed of the Writ Petition, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution while protecting revenue under Section 86-A. The court balanced timely adjudication with fair treatment for the petitioner, ensuring compliance with the CGST Act provisions. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763495