<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1465 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459618</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded the case to the AO for reevaluation, finding the 8% GP rate on alleged bogus purchases excessive. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition was partially overturned. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, necessitating fresh consideration of the profit margin estimate by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1465 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459618</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded the case to the AO for reevaluation, finding the 8% GP rate on alleged bogus purchases excessive. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the addition was partially overturned. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, necessitating fresh consideration of the profit margin estimate by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>