<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1075 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459596</link>
    <description>The HC held KSSPL liable for the missing plant and machinery from the factory premises, citing gross negligence in its security duties. Consequently, KSSPL was ordered to pay Rs. 70 lakhs to the OL for ICL&#039;s account, with an eight-week deadline. Failure to comply would result in a 12% annual interest penalty. The OL was authorized to pursue further legal recovery actions if necessary. The application was disposed of with these directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1075 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459596</link>
      <description>The HC held KSSPL liable for the missing plant and machinery from the factory premises, citing gross negligence in its security duties. Consequently, KSSPL was ordered to pay Rs. 70 lakhs to the OL for ICL&#039;s account, with an eight-week deadline. Failure to comply would result in a 12% annual interest penalty. The OL was authorized to pursue further legal recovery actions if necessary. The application was disposed of with these directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>