<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1326 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appellant&#039;s refund claim under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The Tribunal determined that the finalization of provisional assessment should be considered the date of payment for refund claims, aligning with the precedent in M/s. Bharat Ship Breaker Corporation. The claim was deemed within the prescribed time limit, emphasizing the significance of assessment finalization in limitation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1326 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appellant&#039;s refund claim under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The Tribunal determined that the finalization of provisional assessment should be considered the date of payment for refund claims, aligning with the precedent in M/s. Bharat Ship Breaker Corporation. The claim was deemed within the prescribed time limit, emphasizing the significance of assessment finalization in limitation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>