<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 931 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459591</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging SEBI&#039;s circular, affirming SEBI&#039;s authority to mandate disclosure of mutual fund commissions by distributors. The court emphasized judicial deference to economic regulation, underscoring SEBI&#039;s role in ensuring transparency and informed investor decision-making, unless a clear constitutional violation is evident.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 931 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459591</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the writ petition challenging SEBI&#039;s circular, affirming SEBI&#039;s authority to mandate disclosure of mutual fund commissions by distributors. The court emphasized judicial deference to economic regulation, underscoring SEBI&#039;s role in ensuring transparency and informed investor decision-making, unless a clear constitutional violation is evident.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>