<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1010 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763430</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s remand order sending the matter back to the ITAT for fresh consideration of alleged incriminating material in proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The relevance and effect of that material were left open to be fully argued by both sides before the Tribunal, and all rights and contentions were expressly preserved. The issue was therefore not finally determined at this stage, and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1010 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763430</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s remand order sending the matter back to the ITAT for fresh consideration of alleged incriminating material in proceedings under the Income Tax Act. The relevance and effect of that material were left open to be fully argued by both sides before the Tribunal, and all rights and contentions were expressly preserved. The issue was therefore not finally determined at this stage, and the special leave petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>