<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39808</link>
    <description>Income remitted into taxable territories by a resident but not ordinarily resident was held taxable where it represented business profits accruing outside the taxable territories during the same accounting year. Section 4(1)(b)(ii) was read as taxing income accruing or arising outside the taxable territories in the year of account, while section 4(1)(b)(iii) covered earlier-year profits brought in during the year. The second proviso was treated as imposing conditions on taxability for such assessees, not as limiting remittance-based taxation only to past profits. The clauses were held supplementary rather than mutually exclusive, so current-year foreign profits brought into India remained chargeable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39808</link>
      <description>Income remitted into taxable territories by a resident but not ordinarily resident was held taxable where it represented business profits accruing outside the taxable territories during the same accounting year. Section 4(1)(b)(ii) was read as taxing income accruing or arising outside the taxable territories in the year of account, while section 4(1)(b)(iii) covered earlier-year profits brought in during the year. The second proviso was treated as imposing conditions on taxability for such assessees, not as limiting remittance-based taxation only to past profits. The clauses were held supplementary rather than mutually exclusive, so current-year foreign profits brought into India remained chargeable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>