https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763388 The HC ordered the Respondents to release the seized consignment in compliance with the CESTAT order, rejecting their imposition of conditions and insistence on drawing a sample. The Court found the Respondents' actions unjustified, as they had not secured a stay on the CESTAT order. The Respondents were given two weeks to comply unless a stay was obtained. The Court emphasized that delaying tactics to avoid implementing the Tribunal's decision were unacceptable. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:47:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763388 The HC ordered the Respondents to release the seized consignment in compliance with the CESTAT order, rejecting their imposition of conditions and insistence on drawing a sample. The Court found the Respondents' actions unjustified, as they had not secured a stay on the CESTAT order. The Respondents were given two weeks to comply unless a stay was obtained. The Court emphasized that delaying tactics to avoid implementing the Tribunal's decision were unacceptable. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763388