<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 969 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763389</link>
    <description>A show cause notice was quashed where adjudication had remained pending for nearly 25 years from the notice and more than 30 years from the import. The respondents&#039; explanations for the delay had already been rejected in an earlier decision concerning a co-noticee on the same notice, and the court followed that reasoning to hold the delay unjustified. The notice was therefore set aside in favour of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 969 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763389</link>
      <description>A show cause notice was quashed where adjudication had remained pending for nearly 25 years from the notice and more than 30 years from the import. The respondents&#039; explanations for the delay had already been rejected in an earlier decision concerning a co-noticee on the same notice, and the court followed that reasoning to hold the delay unjustified. The notice was therefore set aside in favour of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>