<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (9) TMI 45 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39802</link>
    <description>Legal expenses incurred to defend a company&#039;s nominee or managing director in criminal proceedings arising from business operations may be deductible where, on a practical and commercial view, the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. The governing test is whether the proceedings are sufficiently connected with the assessee&#039;s business and whether the defence protects the business interest and reputation rather than the individual&#039;s personal position. On the stated facts, the nominee acted in a representative capacity for the company, so the defence costs were treated as business expenditure and allowed as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (9) TMI 45 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39802</link>
      <description>Legal expenses incurred to defend a company&#039;s nominee or managing director in criminal proceedings arising from business operations may be deductible where, on a practical and commercial view, the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for the business. The governing test is whether the proceedings are sufficiently connected with the assessee&#039;s business and whether the defence protects the business interest and reputation rather than the individual&#039;s personal position. On the stated facts, the nominee acted in a representative capacity for the company, so the defence costs were treated as business expenditure and allowed as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>