<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 970 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763390</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices and orders in original due to unjustified delays in adjudication, ranging from 9 to 20 years. The Respondents&#039; reasons, such as transfer to the call book and office restructuring, were deemed insufficient. The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioners, making the rule absolute without awarding costs, and disposed of any pending Interim Applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 970 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763390</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed and set aside the show cause notices and orders in original due to unjustified delays in adjudication, ranging from 9 to 20 years. The Respondents&#039; reasons, such as transfer to the call book and office restructuring, were deemed insufficient. The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioners, making the rule absolute without awarding costs, and disposed of any pending Interim Applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>