<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 985 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763405</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that a revised return filed under section 139(5) after filing a belated return under section 153A is invalid. The assessee filed a belated return on 10.10.2013 and attempted to revise it on 30.03.2014. The tribunal ruled that belated returns cannot be revised under section 139(5), making the revised return legally invalid. Consequently, the assessee could not claim section 54B benefits in the invalid revised return. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 985 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763405</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad held that a revised return filed under section 139(5) after filing a belated return under section 153A is invalid. The assessee filed a belated return on 10.10.2013 and attempted to revise it on 30.03.2014. The tribunal ruled that belated returns cannot be revised under section 139(5), making the revised return legally invalid. Consequently, the assessee could not claim section 54B benefits in the invalid revised return. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>