<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 986 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition under section 68 related to capital introduction and the ad-hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s evidence of agricultural income and justification for expenses satisfactory, deeming the initial addition and disallowance by the Assessing Officer unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 986 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition under section 68 related to capital introduction and the ad-hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s evidence of agricultural income and justification for expenses satisfactory, deeming the initial addition and disallowance by the Assessing Officer unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>