<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1005 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763425</link>
    <description>HC Bombay quashed an Order-in-Original (O-I-O) due to improper service of notice at an incorrect address. The court found significant discrepancies in the address used for correspondence, violating principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded for reevaluation, with directions to serve future notices at the correct address, ensuring proper legal communication and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1005 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763425</link>
      <description>HC Bombay quashed an Order-in-Original (O-I-O) due to improper service of notice at an incorrect address. The court found significant discrepancies in the address used for correspondence, violating principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded for reevaluation, with directions to serve future notices at the correct address, ensuring proper legal communication and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>