<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1007 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763427</link>
    <description>SC addressed multiple legal issues involving tax-related interim orders and confiscated goods. The Court set aside previous High Court orders due to insufficient state revenue protection mechanisms. SC remanded cases back to HC for fresh review, emphasizing the need for proper bank guarantees and security measures when releasing confiscated goods. The judgment focused on procedural safeguards without examining substantive case merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1007 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763427</link>
      <description>SC addressed multiple legal issues involving tax-related interim orders and confiscated goods. The Court set aside previous High Court orders due to insufficient state revenue protection mechanisms. SC remanded cases back to HC for fresh review, emphasizing the need for proper bank guarantees and security measures when releasing confiscated goods. The judgment focused on procedural safeguards without examining substantive case merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>