<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459576</link>
    <description>Payments to non-resident certification and related service providers for services performed outside India were not chargeable to tax in India where the recipients had no permanent establishment in India and the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or a process to the assessee under the treaty. As the sums were not chargeable, section 195 withholding was not attracted and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not be sustained. The analysis also noted consistency, because similar expenses had been accepted in earlier and later years on the same factual basis. The expenditure was therefore deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459576</link>
      <description>Payments to non-resident certification and related service providers for services performed outside India were not chargeable to tax in India where the recipients had no permanent establishment in India and the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or a process to the assessee under the treaty. As the sums were not chargeable, section 195 withholding was not attracted and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not be sustained. The analysis also noted consistency, because similar expenses had been accepted in earlier and later years on the same factual basis. The expenditure was therefore deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>