https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459558 The HC dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal, affirming that the sale deed was not a sham and nominal transaction, and the suit was within limitation. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove possession or the nominal nature of the transaction. The defendant's adverse possession claim was negated, and the sale deed's validity was upheld. en-us Sat, 19 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:21:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459558 The HC dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal, affirming that the sale deed was not a sham and nominal transaction, and the suit was within limitation. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove possession or the nominal nature of the transaction. The defendant's adverse possession claim was negated, and the sale deed's validity was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 19 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459558