https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459555 A sale deed is sham and nominal, and therefore ineffective in law, where the recited consideration is not proved, possession is never delivered, the original deed remains with the transferor, and surrounding circumstances show no intention to effect a genuine transfer. Article 91 of the Limitation Act applies only to voidable instruments that must first be cancelled or set aside; it does not govern a void, sham, or inoperative document. On that basis, a suit challenging such an instrument is not barred by Article 91 and proceeds on the limitation applicable to the substantive relief sought. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:04:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459555 A sale deed is sham and nominal, and therefore ineffective in law, where the recited consideration is not proved, possession is never delivered, the original deed remains with the transferor, and surrounding circumstances show no intention to effect a genuine transfer. Article 91 of the Limitation Act applies only to voidable instruments that must first be cancelled or set aside; it does not govern a void, sham, or inoperative document. On that basis, a suit challenging such an instrument is not barred by Article 91 and proceeds on the limitation applicable to the substantive relief sought. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459555