<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1387 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459544</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the cooperative bank&#039;s deduction claim under section 36(1)(vii)(a) of the IT Act. The Tribunal determined that the bank, recognized by the RBI as a non-scheduled bank, met the criteria for the deduction, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the cooperative bank&#039;s treatment for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1387 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459544</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the cooperative bank&#039;s deduction claim under section 36(1)(vii)(a) of the IT Act. The Tribunal determined that the bank, recognized by the RBI as a non-scheduled bank, met the criteria for the deduction, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the cooperative bank&#039;s treatment for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>