<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 877 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763297</link>
    <description>Maintainability of appeals arising from enforcement of an arbitral award is governed by the special scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, not by the Code of Civil Procedure or the Commercial Courts Act. Section 36 enforcement does not convert the matter into a proceeding under Order XXI CPC, and any appellate right must be found within Section 37 of the arbitration statute itself. Where an earlier final decision had already determined the same maintainability question between the parties, the later appeal was barred by res judicata or principles analogous to res judicata. The challenge to the consent order therefore failed at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 877 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763297</link>
      <description>Maintainability of appeals arising from enforcement of an arbitral award is governed by the special scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, not by the Code of Civil Procedure or the Commercial Courts Act. Section 36 enforcement does not convert the matter into a proceeding under Order XXI CPC, and any appellate right must be found within Section 37 of the arbitration statute itself. Where an earlier final decision had already determined the same maintainability question between the parties, the later appeal was barred by res judicata or principles analogous to res judicata. The challenge to the consent order therefore failed at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>