<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 880 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763300</link>
    <description>The National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 was applied as an offence-centric scheme, allowing the Central Government to direct investigation of a Scheduled Offence and permitting the NIA, under Section 8, to investigate other offences with a real nexus to that offence. The expression &quot;the accused&quot; was read contextually to include persons whose alleged offences emerge during the connected investigation, not only the original accused. On the facts, the Court found a clear link between the narcotics-related Gujarat investigation and the Punjab FIRs, so the directions under Sections 6(5) and 8 were valid and the cancellation of bail was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 880 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763300</link>
      <description>The National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 was applied as an offence-centric scheme, allowing the Central Government to direct investigation of a Scheduled Offence and permitting the NIA, under Section 8, to investigate other offences with a real nexus to that offence. The expression &quot;the accused&quot; was read contextually to include persons whose alleged offences emerge during the connected investigation, not only the original accused. On the facts, the Court found a clear link between the narcotics-related Gujarat investigation and the Punjab FIRs, so the directions under Sections 6(5) and 8 were valid and the cancellation of bail was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>