<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 881 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763301</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of propylene/propene feed stock depends on the applicable heading, chapter notes and General Rules for Interpretation, including whether the product is a separate chemically defined compound of the required purity. On the stated record, the material showed a mixture with other hydrocarbons and did not establish the purity basis needed for classification as propene in pure or commercially pure form, so the classification adopted in the adjudication was treated as unsustainable and remanded for reconsideration. The note also states that, where declarations, returns and departmental correspondence already show departmental knowledge, the extended period cannot be invoked absent suppression or wilful misstatement, and penalties linked to that premise do not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 881 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763301</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of propylene/propene feed stock depends on the applicable heading, chapter notes and General Rules for Interpretation, including whether the product is a separate chemically defined compound of the required purity. On the stated record, the material showed a mixture with other hydrocarbons and did not establish the purity basis needed for classification as propene in pure or commercially pure form, so the classification adopted in the adjudication was treated as unsustainable and remanded for reconsideration. The note also states that, where declarations, returns and departmental correspondence already show departmental knowledge, the extended period cannot be invoked absent suppression or wilful misstatement, and penalties linked to that premise do not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>