<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 887 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763307</link>
    <description>Universal legatees cannot bypass an appointed Administrator Pendente lite to assert direct rights in estate property before assent to the legacy is completed, because the estate remains under representative control under the Indian Succession Act. Civil-court relief is unavailable to challenge internal board decisions of independent companies where the Companies Act provides the relevant statutory framework; strangers to the companies cannot invoke oppression or mismanagement remedies, and the civil suit is barred. Interference with refusal of interim injunction in intra-court appeal is confined to cases of perversity, patent illegality, or jurisdictional error, and no such ground was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 887 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763307</link>
      <description>Universal legatees cannot bypass an appointed Administrator Pendente lite to assert direct rights in estate property before assent to the legacy is completed, because the estate remains under representative control under the Indian Succession Act. Civil-court relief is unavailable to challenge internal board decisions of independent companies where the Companies Act provides the relevant statutory framework; strangers to the companies cannot invoke oppression or mismanagement remedies, and the civil suit is barred. Interference with refusal of interim injunction in intra-court appeal is confined to cases of perversity, patent illegality, or jurisdictional error, and no such ground was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>