<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39778</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed writ petitions challenging income tax assessment revisions under section 263, holding that statutory appeals must first be exhausted. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is not intended to supersede statutory appellate mechanisms. No exceptional circumstances were found to justify bypassing the statutory appeal process. The Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional powers were upheld, and the petitioners&#039; challenges were rejected for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39778</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed writ petitions challenging income tax assessment revisions under section 263, holding that statutory appeals must first be exhausted. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is not intended to supersede statutory appellate mechanisms. No exceptional circumstances were found to justify bypassing the statutory appeal process. The Additional Commissioner&#039;s revisional powers were upheld, and the petitioners&#039; challenges were rejected for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>