<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763338</link>
    <description>GST assessments could not be finalised without examining whether Notification No. 9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) exempted the services in question. The Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s activity was said to be undertaken as part of a Government of India department and that the relationship between the petitioner unit and the Nuclear Fuel Complex, as well as the applicability of the exemption for services supplied by one Central Government entity to another, required consideration. As this exemption issue had not been properly addressed, the assessment orders were set aside and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration, with liberty to treat the orders as show-cause notices and decide the assessments afresh after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:41:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 918 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763338</link>
      <description>GST assessments could not be finalised without examining whether Notification No. 9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) exempted the services in question. The Court noted that the petitioner&#039;s activity was said to be undertaken as part of a Government of India department and that the relationship between the petitioner unit and the Nuclear Fuel Complex, as well as the applicability of the exemption for services supplied by one Central Government entity to another, required consideration. As this exemption issue had not been properly addressed, the assessment orders were set aside and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration, with liberty to treat the orders as show-cause notices and decide the assessments afresh after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>