<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 925 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763345</link>
    <description>The HC reviewed a writ petition challenging a demand notice of Rs.7,41,218. While partially acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s plea, the court declined to intervene and dismissed the petition, recommending the petitioner pursue available statutory appellate remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 925 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763345</link>
      <description>The HC reviewed a writ petition challenging a demand notice of Rs.7,41,218. While partially acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s plea, the court declined to intervene and dismissed the petition, recommending the petitioner pursue available statutory appellate remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>