<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 926 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763346</link>
    <description>A GST assessment under section 73 concerning alleged non-reversal of input tax credit on credit notes was set aside conditionally after the Court accepted the plea for a further opportunity. The petitioner&#039;s grievance that the demand notice was not properly served and that portal access was unavailable was addressed by directing verification of amounts already remitted and requiring deposit of 25% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time. On compliance, the impugned order was to be treated as a show cause notice, the petitioner could file objections with supporting material, and the department was required to pass fresh orders after granting a reasonable hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:58:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 926 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763346</link>
      <description>A GST assessment under section 73 concerning alleged non-reversal of input tax credit on credit notes was set aside conditionally after the Court accepted the plea for a further opportunity. The petitioner&#039;s grievance that the demand notice was not properly served and that portal access was unavailable was addressed by directing verification of amounts already remitted and requiring deposit of 25% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time. On compliance, the impugned order was to be treated as a show cause notice, the petitioner could file objections with supporting material, and the department was required to pass fresh orders after granting a reasonable hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>