https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763348 The petitioner's works were subjected to GST at 12% before the rate increased to 18% from 01.01.2022, and tax was thereafter paid at the enhanced rate on subsequent invoices. The State GST Department accepted that the higher rate was payable by the Government entity, so the petitioner was entitled to reimbursement of the 6% differential GST for the relevant period. The objection that the petitioner should pursue an arbitration-based contractual remedy was rejected because no disputed questions of fact required relegation to that mechanism. Payment was directed within the time granted, with interest at 6% per annum payable on default. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:51:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763348 The petitioner's works were subjected to GST at 12% before the rate increased to 18% from 01.01.2022, and tax was thereafter paid at the enhanced rate on subsequent invoices. The State GST Department accepted that the higher rate was payable by the Government entity, so the petitioner was entitled to reimbursement of the 6% differential GST for the relevant period. The objection that the petitioner should pursue an arbitration-based contractual remedy was rejected because no disputed questions of fact required relegation to that mechanism. Payment was directed within the time granted, with interest at 6% per annum payable on default. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763348