<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 931 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763351</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay quashed the Order-in-Appeal due to a breach of natural justice, as the petitioner was denied the opportunity to explain the filing delay. The respondent was directed to issue a defect memo, allowing the petitioner to rectify defects and have the appeal heard on its merits. All rights and contentions were kept open, and the rule was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:58:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 931 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763351</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay quashed the Order-in-Appeal due to a breach of natural justice, as the petitioner was denied the opportunity to explain the filing delay. The respondent was directed to issue a defect memo, allowing the petitioner to rectify defects and have the appeal heard on its merits. All rights and contentions were kept open, and the rule was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>