<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459537</link>
    <description>A transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee commission was found unsustainable where the assessee had charged 0.5% from associated enterprises, the same rate had been accepted in several Tribunal decisions, and the record showed that the rate compared favourably with bank commission ranges. On those facts, the upward adjustment was deleted because a different arm&#039;s length estimate could not displace the supported and accepted commission rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459537</link>
      <description>A transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee commission was found unsustainable where the assessee had charged 0.5% from associated enterprises, the same rate had been accepted in several Tribunal decisions, and the record showed that the rate compared favourably with bank commission ranges. On those facts, the upward adjustment was deleted because a different arm&#039;s length estimate could not displace the supported and accepted commission rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>