<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 886 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459508</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s winding-up petition against the respondent company, which had cleared the principal debt during proceedings. The court held that it was not just or equitable to wind up the company solely for unpaid interest. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue interest recovery through civil remedies, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:02:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 886 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459508</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s winding-up petition against the respondent company, which had cleared the principal debt during proceedings. The court held that it was not just or equitable to wind up the company solely for unpaid interest. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue interest recovery through civil remedies, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>