https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459507 A prior final determination under Section 8 deleting the respondent's name as tenant precluded the Tahsildar from reopening that tenancy question in later suo motu proceedings under Section 49B. Section 49B applies only where the person is still a tenant and was dispossessed on the relevant date; once tenancy had been conclusively decided inter se the parties, there was no basis to revisit it. The respondent also could not claim deemed tenancy under Section 6, because the earlier acceptance of the landlords' personal cultivation case through saldars had already negatived that claim. The suo motu action was therefore without jurisdiction and unsustainable. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:44:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459507 A prior final determination under Section 8 deleting the respondent's name as tenant precluded the Tahsildar from reopening that tenancy question in later suo motu proceedings under Section 49B. Section 49B applies only where the person is still a tenant and was dispossessed on the relevant date; once tenancy had been conclusively decided inter se the parties, there was no basis to revisit it. The respondent also could not claim deemed tenancy under Section 6, because the earlier acceptance of the landlords' personal cultivation case through saldars had already negatived that claim. The suo motu action was therefore without jurisdiction and unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459507