<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1291 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459502</link>
    <description>A writ petition was held maintainable where the claimed service benefit was traced to the statutory framework and the Bar Council&#039;s own resolution, so the objection on maintainability failed. On the merits, a resolution fixing the Secretary&#039;s pay by reference to the District Judge&#039;s scale did not create an automatic right to every later revision of that scale; under the governing rules, the Council retained power to fix remuneration from time to time, and any further revision required a fresh decision. The claim to automatic pay revision was therefore negatived, while a consensual monetary relief was ultimately secured for the employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1291 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459502</link>
      <description>A writ petition was held maintainable where the claimed service benefit was traced to the statutory framework and the Bar Council&#039;s own resolution, so the objection on maintainability failed. On the merits, a resolution fixing the Secretary&#039;s pay by reference to the District Judge&#039;s scale did not create an automatic right to every later revision of that scale; under the governing rules, the Council retained power to fix remuneration from time to time, and any further revision required a fresh decision. The claim to automatic pay revision was therefore negatived, while a consensual monetary relief was ultimately secured for the employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>