<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1381 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459498</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit under section 90 for non-filing of Form No. 67. The Tribunal held that Rule 128(9) does not provide for FTC disallowance due to delayed filing, Form No. 67 filing is directory rather than mandatory, and DTAA provisions override domestic rules. The decision followed precedent from Ashish Agarwal case, which remained unstayed by higher courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1381 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459498</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit under section 90 for non-filing of Form No. 67. The Tribunal held that Rule 128(9) does not provide for FTC disallowance due to delayed filing, Form No. 67 filing is directory rather than mandatory, and DTAA provisions override domestic rules. The decision followed precedent from Ashish Agarwal case, which remained unstayed by higher courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>