<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1382 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459499</link>
    <description>Delhi HC upheld ITAT&#039;s exclusion of three entities from transfer pricing comparables. L&amp;amp;T was excluded due to inability to bifurcate revenues from software development services versus products with precision. Wipro was rejected despite functional similarity because of tainted controlled transactions with related entity. Zylog was excluded for same reasons as L&amp;amp;T regarding revenue bifurcation issues. Court found no legal infirmity in ITAT&#039;s reasoning and determined no substantial question of law arose from the exclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1382 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459499</link>
      <description>Delhi HC upheld ITAT&#039;s exclusion of three entities from transfer pricing comparables. L&amp;amp;T was excluded due to inability to bifurcate revenues from software development services versus products with precision. Wipro was rejected despite functional similarity because of tainted controlled transactions with related entity. Zylog was excluded for same reasons as L&amp;amp;T regarding revenue bifurcation issues. Court found no legal infirmity in ITAT&#039;s reasoning and determined no substantial question of law arose from the exclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>