<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 790 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, on the employee for inadvertent Cenvat credit availment, acknowledging the voluntary credit reversal and lack of malafide intent. The Tribunal also considered the impact of the corporate insolvency resolution process, which extinguished prior demands, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 790 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, on the employee for inadvertent Cenvat credit availment, acknowledging the voluntary credit reversal and lack of malafide intent. The Tribunal also considered the impact of the corporate insolvency resolution process, which extinguished prior demands, thereby allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>