<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 800 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763220</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 114A of the Customs Act, determining that the differential custom duty was confirmed solely against another party. The tribunal found no basis for joint and several liability for the appellant, as the duty was already paid and settled by the other party. Consequently, the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 800 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763220</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 114A of the Customs Act, determining that the differential custom duty was confirmed solely against another party. The tribunal found no basis for joint and several liability for the appellant, as the duty was already paid and settled by the other party. Consequently, the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>