<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 803 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763223</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The case involved selection of tested party due to functional differences between associated enterprise and assessee regarding assets and risks. TPO rejected assessee&#039;s segmental results after choosing assessee as tested party. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting no additional segmental evidence was provided that wasn&#039;t already before AO. Tribunal agreed with exclusion of two export companies from arm&#039;s length range and confirmed that associated enterprise could only be compared with TPO-selected comparables due to functional similarity as tested party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 10:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 803 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763223</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The case involved selection of tested party due to functional differences between associated enterprise and assessee regarding assets and risks. TPO rejected assessee&#039;s segmental results after choosing assessee as tested party. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting no additional segmental evidence was provided that wasn&#039;t already before AO. Tribunal agreed with exclusion of two export companies from arm&#039;s length range and confirmed that associated enterprise could only be compared with TPO-selected comparables due to functional similarity as tested party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>