<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 818 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the deduction under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18. It held that the delay in filing Form 56F was procedural and did not invalidate the claim, emphasizing that procedural lapses should not obstruct substantive compliance. The decision supports the legislative intent to promote SEZ activities, restoring the deduction without remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 818 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the deduction under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18. It held that the delay in filing Form 56F was procedural and did not invalidate the claim, emphasizing that procedural lapses should not obstruct substantive compliance. The decision supports the legislative intent to promote SEZ activities, restoring the deduction without remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>