<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 826 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763246</link>
    <description>The Telangana HC disposed of a petition concerning GST refund claims by a joint venture. The petitioner sought refund of excess tax deducted for work executed across Telangana and Maharashtra states. The court held that since the nature of supply was intra-state in respective states, tax liability should be discharged individually in each state equivalent to work executed therein. However, the petitioner failed to provide evidence of the proportion of work executed in each state or discharge of tax liability in Maharashtra. The court kept demand notices dated 13.03.2020 in abeyance pending disposal of refund applications in accordance with orders in related writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 826 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763246</link>
      <description>The Telangana HC disposed of a petition concerning GST refund claims by a joint venture. The petitioner sought refund of excess tax deducted for work executed across Telangana and Maharashtra states. The court held that since the nature of supply was intra-state in respective states, tax liability should be discharged individually in each state equivalent to work executed therein. However, the petitioner failed to provide evidence of the proportion of work executed in each state or discharge of tax liability in Maharashtra. The court kept demand notices dated 13.03.2020 in abeyance pending disposal of refund applications in accordance with orders in related writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>