<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1996 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459473</link>
    <description>The earlier allotment process under the 07.06.1997 resolution did not result in a completed allotment because the society failed to comply with the payment conditions and sought altered terms, so that arrangement lapsed under the applicable land disposal regulations. Eligibility was then governed by the fresh allotment made on 01.09.2003 and the letter of intent dated 11.12.2003, supported by the Government Resolution dated 09.07.1999. Condition No. 8 of Annexure-A treated service on the date of the indent or letter of intent as the controlling membership criterion, and the society&#039;s later correspondence accepted those fresh terms. The appellants therefore could not rely on the earlier dates for eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 12:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1996 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459473</link>
      <description>The earlier allotment process under the 07.06.1997 resolution did not result in a completed allotment because the society failed to comply with the payment conditions and sought altered terms, so that arrangement lapsed under the applicable land disposal regulations. Eligibility was then governed by the fresh allotment made on 01.09.2003 and the letter of intent dated 11.12.2003, supported by the Government Resolution dated 09.07.1999. Condition No. 8 of Annexure-A treated service on the date of the indent or letter of intent as the controlling membership criterion, and the society&#039;s later correspondence accepted those fresh terms. The appellants therefore could not rely on the earlier dates for eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>