<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459466</link>
    <description>In a private defamation complaint, the Magistrate may issue process on a prima facie view from the complainant&#039;s materials, but if those materials themselves clearly disclose a complete exception to section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, the complaint may be dismissed at the threshold. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code may quash proceedings only on the basis of the record that was before the Magistrate and cannot be used to rely on unproved material or disputed facts to extend the benefit of an exception. The summoning order was therefore not interfered with, and the Fourth Exception was left for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1470 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459466</link>
      <description>In a private defamation complaint, the Magistrate may issue process on a prima facie view from the complainant&#039;s materials, but if those materials themselves clearly disclose a complete exception to section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, the complaint may be dismissed at the threshold. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code may quash proceedings only on the basis of the record that was before the Magistrate and cannot be used to rely on unproved material or disputed facts to extend the benefit of an exception. The summoning order was therefore not interfered with, and the Fourth Exception was left for trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>