<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Practice support:Non-application of mind by authorities- need scrutiny of procedure and documentation at each stage. Non-application of mind, if proved, can be good ground of contesting proceeding as void , devoid of merits, irregular, unsustainable, liable to quashed etc. depending on nature of proceeding and seriousness of issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13209</link>
    <description>Non-application of mind by authorities is a procedural infirmity that can render actions void or quashable where the administrative record lacks recorded reasons or shows mechanical, non-comparative, or generic decision-making; successful challenges require careful documentary scrutiny at each stage to prove absence of independent reasoning, particularly where both lower and higher authorities failed to form an opinion as mandated by the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:55:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Practice support:Non-application of mind by authorities- need scrutiny of procedure and documentation at each stage. Non-application of mind, if proved, can be good ground of contesting proceeding as void , devoid of merits, irregular, unsustainable, liable to quashed etc. depending on nature of proceeding and seriousness of issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13209</link>
      <description>Non-application of mind by authorities is a procedural infirmity that can render actions void or quashable where the administrative record lacks recorded reasons or shows mechanical, non-comparative, or generic decision-making; successful challenges require careful documentary scrutiny at each stage to prove absence of independent reasoning, particularly where both lower and higher authorities failed to form an opinion as mandated by the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:55:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>