https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39725 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the sale despite an incorrect amount in the sale proclamation. The petitioner's failure to deposit the recoverable amount under Rule 61 led to the dismissal of the application to set aside the sale. The court rejected arguments on jurisdiction and the applicability of Rule 9, affirming the validity of the sale and awarding costs to the respondent. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:21:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39725 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the sale despite an incorrect amount in the sale proclamation. The petitioner's failure to deposit the recoverable amount under Rule 61 led to the dismissal of the application to set aside the sale. The court rejected arguments on jurisdiction and the applicability of Rule 9, affirming the validity of the sale and awarding costs to the respondent. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39725