https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83983 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order. The Tribunal found that the refund claim was erroneously rejected by the lower authorities on the ground of limitation u/s 11B, as there was an inconsistency in treating part of the amount paid as a pre-deposit and the remaining amount differently, despite being of the same nature. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, holding that the issue required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. en-us Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:28 +0530 Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83983 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order. The Tribunal found that the refund claim was erroneously rejected by the lower authorities on the ground of limitation u/s 11B, as there was an inconsistency in treating part of the amount paid as a pre-deposit and the remaining amount differently, despite being of the same nature. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, holding that the issue required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. Highlights Service Tax Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:28 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83983