<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 731 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763151</link>
    <description>Sales tax remitted under the Incentive Scheme 2001 for economic development of Kutch District was treated as a capital-linked remission, not an outright tax exemption, and therefore was not includible in the transaction value for central excise valuation. The Tribunal applied the test under the Central Excise Act that only amounts actually paid or actually payable at the time of removal form part of assessable value, and noted the Gujarat VAT framework separately recognises exemption and remission while deeming remitted tax as paid to the treasury. On that basis, the remitted sales tax could not be added to the assessable value, the demand failed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 731 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763151</link>
      <description>Sales tax remitted under the Incentive Scheme 2001 for economic development of Kutch District was treated as a capital-linked remission, not an outright tax exemption, and therefore was not includible in the transaction value for central excise valuation. The Tribunal applied the test under the Central Excise Act that only amounts actually paid or actually payable at the time of removal form part of assessable value, and noted the Gujarat VAT framework separately recognises exemption and remission while deeming remitted tax as paid to the treasury. On that basis, the remitted sales tax could not be added to the assessable value, the demand failed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>